[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:36:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:20:19PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Oh, I was wrong previously, gcc does respect __attribute__
> ((__regparm__ (3))) flag (I forget to add -Os so it still uses stack
> to store value). And the bug is still there ! Try this test program:
Thanks Bean. I have opened an entry in GCC bugzilla, and submitted your
test program in it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41246
Hopefully they'll fix it in later versions, and hopefully people will
upgrade soon. In the meantime, we're stuck with it.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Yves Blusseau, 2009/09/01
- Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, David Miller, 2009/09/01
- Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/09/03
- Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, David Miller, 2009/09/03
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/09/06
- Re: Fwd: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Robert Millan, 2009/09/08
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/02
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC,
Robert Millan <=
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Felix Zielcke, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/03