[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC
From: |
David Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT) |
From: "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:08:34 +0200
> I can't agree with designating nested functions as root issue. Imagine
> tomorrow we discover a bug in "for" loop compiling. This wouldn't be a
> reason to replace all "for"s with "while"s. The root issue is compiler
> bug and it should be fixed
I can tell you that in kernel land when we encounter a compiler
bug we usually have to simply cope with it somehow, and if that
means rearranging some loop to not trigger a bug that is sometimes
what it indeed does mean.
Also, a small project using a pretty obscure feature of gcc was in a
way asking for trouble :-)
But if you want to decrease your testing base every time we hit some
compiler bug you don't particularly like, well I guess that's your
perogative then...
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/02
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Robert Millan, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Felix Zielcke, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/03