[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:43:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
> We do file the bugs, but we recognize that 1) the fix won't
> propagate for months, if that and 2) requiring a compiler update
> decreases our testing base which is the most important thing we
> have.
>
> Do you get that? "The size of your tester base is the most
> important thing you have."
It's one of them. Other things are important, too.
I believe the best response is to aim for balance.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/02
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Robert Millan, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Felix Zielcke, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/03