[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font package naming convention
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Font package naming convention |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:45:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Alex,
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 12:36:30PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> I think the majority should decide. So if the most of guix people think
> that it should be named "bar", then let it be so.
for this we would need an "infrastructure": a social contract, a voting
system and what else not, which seems a bit like overkill to decide on package
names. Even debian does not hold general resolutions for the names of their
packages...
> However, I still think that having the following packages would be the
> best:
> ttf-bitstream-vera
> ttf-dejavu
> ttf-freefont
> ttf-liberation
> ttf-symbola
Okay, could you please formulate your suggestion into a rule that we could
follow for other font packages than these five?
Andreas
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/19