[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font package naming convention
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Font package naming convention |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:30:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:53:21AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> If there’s rough consensus on this, the next step would be to write this
> informal rule in the manual, and to update package names.
>
> Any volunteer? Alex? :-)
I volunteer, as I feel responsible for the package guidelines.
Andreas
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/20
- [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Alex Kost, 2014/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/24