[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font package naming convention
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: Font package naming convention |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:38 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge (2014-11-03 12:30 +0300) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:53:21AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> If there’s rough consensus on this, the next step would be to write this
>> informal rule in the manual, and to update package names.
>>
>> Any volunteer? Alex? :-)
>
> I volunteer, as I feel responsible for the package guidelines.
Great! Thanks and sorry if my messages here were offensive. I'm going
to update and resend my patch with liberation fonts package for the new
convention when the names of the existing font packages will be updated.
--
Alex
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention,
Alex Kost <=
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/20
- [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Alex Kost, 2014/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/24