[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font package naming convention
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: Font package naming convention |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:09:15 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès (2014-11-19 12:01 +0300) wrote:
> I think there were a couple of packages submitted, notably the
> Liberation font.
>
> What about resubmitting them following the agreed-upon naming
> convention, Alex?
Sure, I'm just waiting for the existing packages to be updated, because
I don't fully understand how the liberation package should be named now.
“font-liberation”?
> Andreas, could you take a look at updating the guidelines? Do you want
> to handle the rename of existing font packages as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
--
Alex
- Re: Font package naming convention, (continued)
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention,
Alex Kost <=
- [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Alex Kost, 2014/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/24