[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: ‘core-updates’ is back! |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:44:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:10:42PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> Since we're on the topic, I would like to switch to GCC 6 or 7 soon...
>>> Are we agile enough to use the very latest GCC by default yet? :-)
>>
>> That would be nice to at least move to GCC 6. My aarch64 board is
>> currently idle, I can see how well it works on my machine.
>
> The main issue with GCC 6 is that we need to port the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
> patches again. But we might want to do that even if switching to 7.
I think we should upgrade. My preference would be GCC 6, which I think
may trigger fewer build failures than GCC 7, but maybe GCC 7 would be
fine.
Are you sure the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH thing isn’t already in GCC 6?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- ‘core-updates’ is back!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/08/28
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/29
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/31
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/31
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/30
Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Andy Wingo, 2017/08/29