[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compatibility libraries.
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: compatibility libraries. |
Date: |
26 Apr 2004 19:29:59 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
Amit Bhatia <bhatia2@nospam.com> writes:
A. Because it makes the message harder to read.
Q. Why should I not top-post?
Please do not top-post. Message re-ordered.
> > What issue? Does the executable run?
> It does not run. Produces a segmentation fault straightaway.
Whenever the executable crashes, your first step should *always*
be firing up a debugger, and seeing *where* it crashes.
If you do not know what a debugger is, or how to use it, start here:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb_2.html#SEC5
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/21
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/21
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/24
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/24
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/26
- Re: compatibility libraries.,
Paul Pluzhnikov <=
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Maurizio Loreti, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/29
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/29