Re: compatibility libraries.

[Amit Bhatia]

Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> What doesn 'ldd exename' say?
> 
> If it says: "not a dynamic executable", then you need to tell
> whoever made this exe that they are nuts, that statically linking
> executables is *extermely* bad idea, not guaranteed to work even
> across subminor OS/glibc revisions, and that you want a dynamically
> linked one instead.
> 
Paul you are right. The ldd says it is not dynamically linked :( I will ask
the developers if they have the dynamic one with them. The other thing that
someone else suggested was that to install gcc 2.95.3 which will also fetch
compatible libstdc++, etc and then add this path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I
don't know if it would work if the code is statically linked?

 Any comments in this regard?

thanks,
amit.