[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compatibility libraries.
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: compatibility libraries. |
Date: |
27 Apr 2004 16:58:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
Amit Bhatia <bhatia2@nospam.com> writes:
> The ldd says it is not dynamically linked :( ...
> someone else suggested was that to install gcc 2.95.3 which will also fetch
> compatible libstdc++, etc and then add this path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I
> don't know if it would work if the code is statically linked?
Statically linked exectables do not use shared libraries, so your
installing a different library will have absolutely *no* effect.
Besides, it isn't libstdc++ that is giving you the problem.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- Re: compatibility libraries., (continued)
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/21
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/24
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/24
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/26
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/26
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Maurizio Loreti, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/27
- Re: compatibility libraries.,
Paul Pluzhnikov <=
- Re: compatibility libraries., Amit Bhatia, 2004/04/29
- Re: compatibility libraries., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/04/29