[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Processor requirements
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Processor requirements |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:07:36 -0500 |
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:53 -0300, Leonardo Lopes Pereira wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:07:37 -0500
> "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> This is a good question, If I need to say what kind of computers we
> need to support TODAY, I think that still important the support of
> i486 and i586. I do not know where do you live, but they are very used
> here, in Brazil. But if you think that this project will support
> computers of 2015 (I think that I am very optmist), I beleave that
> support to i586 is needed.
Leonardo:
The performance gap between the fastest i486 and a current Pentium-IV is
nearly three decimal orders of magnitude. Regardless of what instruction
set Hurd compiles for, there is simply no way that this large a range
can be effectively supported by a single set of applications.
Try running FC4 on a 486 and you'll see what I'm talking about.
I'm not saying that dropping the 486 is a desirable thing. I'm saying
that we are kidding ourselves if we think it's going to be done well.
shap
- Processor requirements, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/17
- Re: Processor requirements, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/17
- Re: Processor requirements, Leonardo Lopes Pereira, 2005/11/17
- Re: Processor requirements,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Processor requirements, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/19
- Re: Processor requirements, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/21
- Re: Processor requirements, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/11/21
- Re: Processor requirements, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/21
Re: Processor requirements, ness, 2005/11/18