[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Processor requirements
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Processor requirements |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:16:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Bas Wijnen <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, just like 32 bit CPUs. ;-)
>
> We all know what trouble the ext2 translator has because of them. I think we
> should learn from this that we should not depend on something becoming really
> obsolete.
[...]
> I fully agree that we don't need support for the old hardware initially. But
> we shouldn't make the mistake to design critical parts of the system in ways
> that cannot be ported without a complete rewrite of large parts of code.
These two statements seem contradictory. According to your second
paragraph, mapping a whole filesystem into the ext2 server's address
space can be seen as a mistake because it "cannot be ported [to 32-bit
hardware] without a complete rewrite of large parts of code".
Besides, I think that Free Software in general *must* support "old"
hardware. At least, it shouldn't participate in the everlasting rush to
new hardware. That's an ethical problem.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Processor requirements, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/17
- Re: Processor requirements, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/17
- Re: Processor requirements, Leonardo Lopes Pereira, 2005/11/17
- Re: Processor requirements, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/19
- Re: Processor requirements, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/21
- Re: Processor requirements,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Processor requirements, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/21
Re: Processor requirements, ness, 2005/11/18
- Re: Processor requirements, ness, 2005/11/18
- Re: Processor requirements, George Jenkins, 2005/11/24
- Re: Processor requirements, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/24
- Re: Processor requirements, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/25
- Re: Processor requirements, prikulis, 2005/11/26
- Re: Processor requirements, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/11/26
- Re: Processor requirements, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/26