[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question)
From: |
bahadir balban |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:20:40 +0000 |
On 4/15/06, Jonathan S. Shapiro <address@hidden> wrote:
> I do not care for Mach, but it is certainly a counter-example to this
> statement. Also, nearly every widely shipped embedded system is a
> counter-example.
Hi,
Is there a paper that summarizes the goals of the new hurd (e.g.
persistance, capabilities etc.) describing what perceived benefits
these innovations will bring over linux?
Thanks,
Bahadir
- Re: A simple question, (continued)
- RE: A simple question, Jayabalan_Aaron, 2006/04/11
- Re: A simple question, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/11
- Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/12
- Re: A simple question, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/13
- Re: A simple question, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/13
- Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/15
- Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question), olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/15
- Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/15
- Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question),
bahadir balban <=
- Re: Hurd and microkernels (was: Re: A simple question), Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/15
- Re: Hurd and microkernels, Kristoffer Nyborg Gregertsen, 2006/04/15
- Re: Hurd and microkernels, Tom Bachmann, 2006/04/18
- Re: Hurd and microkernels, Barry deFreese, 2006/04/18
- Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/15
- Re: A simple question, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/15
Re: A simple question, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/04/12
Re: A simple question, MT Rezaie, 2006/04/13