Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack

[Marcus Brinkmann]

At Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:59:38 +0100,
Pierre THIERRY <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 06/01/2007 hora 09:26:
> > If the power relationship between the two actors is rightfully total
> > dominance, I have no principled objection. If the power relationship
> > between the two actors is rightfully a sibling relationship, I do.
> 
> I quite don't see the principle that should lead to that distinction. I
> don't see why processes could not do what we can do on an everyday
> basis, that is give the /usus/ of an object to another process, while
> keeping the /abusus/.

The principle is user's control over their resources, or short "user freedom".

In the total dominance case, the relationship of control over the
resources remains the same before and after the operation.  In the
peer case, it is altered, that's a threat scenario for me.

We already have discussed the other questions extensively half a year ago.

Thanks,
Marcus