[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: C++ |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:44:12 -0800 |
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:20 AM, William Leslie
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Polyinstantiation has been a big topic for bitc. See:
>
> http://www.bitc-lang.org/docs/bitc/bitc-origins.html#Polyinstantiation
>
> "Parametric types, explicit unboxing, and separate compilation do not
> get along. "
Subsequent to that paper, we worked out how to do light-weight
link-time specialization, which would have been implemented in the
next implementation.
shap
- Re: C++, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/03
- Re: C++, William Leslie, 2009/11/04
- Re: C++,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/11/05
- Re: C++, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/08
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, William Leslie, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Michal Suchanek, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Sam Mason, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Sam Mason, 2009/11/09