Re: libtool 2.0 XXX

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Bob,

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:37:07PM CET:
> The "release" branch for libtool 2.0 was created many months ago. 
> After that point there was an intense amount of testing and 
> development added which had no business occuring on a release branch. 
> As far as I know, the oodles of fixes placed on the 2.0 branch are 
> also in the development head.
> 
> Given recent history, what reasoning/evidence exists that the material 
> on the 2.0 branch is more releasable or worthwile than the head 
> development version? Should existing 2.0 be aborted in favor of 
> starting fresh with the head development version?

FWIW: I do not have a strong opinion on this question.
Let someone else decide.

Regards,
Ralf