Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3279 in lilypond: space consecutive tempo marks

[lilypond]

Comment #25 on issue 3279 by address@hidden: space consecutive tempo  
marks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3279

I do not agree with the output of this solution.

%%%%%%%%

Regarding comment 13:
Placement of RehearsalMark at begin of line should not be a COMPROMISE
to accommodate possible collision with tempo indication.

Placement should be correct for RehearsalMark alone (i.e. where a
barline *would be*) and if there is a possible collision, it should be
handled by "collision avoidance", like for any other grob!
Your "compromise solution" still collide if you increase the font-size
of RehearsalMark, and thus is not a sustainable/reliable solution.

%%%%%%%%

Regarding image in #19, why is the last "Larghissimo" left-aligned on the
right-hand side of the KeySignature and not left-aligned on the first
note (g''4)?  That's where I would expect it.

IIRC there was an agreement that tempo indications should be
1. left-aligned on left-hand side of TimeSignature
2. left-aligned on (left-hand side of) the first note
3. (if MMR), left-aligned on (left-hand side of) **where the first note
would be**.

tacet = \repeat unfold 16 R1
music = \repeat unfold 16 c'1
marks = {
  s1*4 | \break
  \tempo "Andante"
  s1*4 | \break
  \tempo "Allegro"
  s1*4 | \break
  s1*4
}

\score {
  <<
    \new Staff {
      <<
        \tacet
        \marks
      >>
    }
    \new Staff \with {
      \consists "Metronome_mark_engraver"
    } {
      <<
        \music
        \marks
      >>
    }
  >>
}

%%%%%%%%

The fact that "the right edge of a tempo mark *must* stay within the
bar which precedes a new tempo mark" is another issue IMHO.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings