Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

[Dan Eble]

On Jan 14, 2021, at 18:33, Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> wrote:
> 
> Alas, all is not well with earlier versions.  Consider the confusing bar 
> numbers in the following elaboration of your example.  How would you resolve 
> it?

My thoughts:

Measure 1 is complete, so the first "2" is not incorrect, though it might not 
be what a user expects.

No measure can start twice.

The second "2" should either be "(2)", or it should be "3" and the "3" should 
be "4".
— 
Dan