[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 15:02:28 -0500 |
On Jan 15, 2021, at 12:17, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> The "Unmetered music" section in the manual already discusses issues
>> with bar numbers, accidentals, and autobeaming. It might be helpful
>> to mention the workaround of using \partial 1024 s1024 to force a
>> new measure at the end of a cadenza.
>
> Sounds reasonable – you have worked on this the most in the last time,
> so if you suggest that we should follow you...
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/610
—
Dan
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, (continued)
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, David Kastrup, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, David Kastrup, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Thomas Morley, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15