Re: clefs, time signatures, and key signatures

[Leo Correia de Verdier]

At least for the clef+time signature I prefer the tighter spacing of the first 
suggestion. Improvement requires things to change. 


> 5 dec. 2023 kl. 07:39 skrev Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>:
> 
> 
>> please have a look at Merge Request 2188 and comment there on how to
>> proceed with the new distances between clefs and time signatures,
>> together with the new distances between clefs and key signatures.
>> 
>>  https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2188
>> 
>> The question is whether the new distances should be based on the
>> widest standard clef glyph (which is the alto clef, and which is
>> done currently in the MR), or whether they should be based on the
>> most common one, the treble clef.
> 
> For better comparison, I've updated/added the screenshots in the MR so
> that you can do a blink-comparison of the images.
> 
> 
>    Werner
>