Re: clefs, time signatures, and key signatures

[Flaming Hakama by Elaine]

>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org, lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 07:10:57 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: clefs, time signatures, and key signatures
>
> >> please have a look at Merge Request 2188 and comment there on how
> >> to proceed with the new distances between clefs and time
> >> signatures, together with the new distances between clefs and key
> >> signatures.
> >>
> >>   https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2188
> >>
> >> The question is whether the new distances should be based on the
> >> widest standard clef glyph (which is the alto clef, and which is
> >> done currently in the MR), or whether they should be based on the
> >> most common one, the treble clef.
> >
> > For better comparison, I've updated/added the screenshots in the MR
> > so that you can do a blink-comparison of the images.
>
> A few people responded, and the opinions are exactly 50:50.  It would
> be great if more people could chime in!
>
>
>     Werner
>

I think that the distances between the clef and the sigs are improved

Elaine