[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2005 00:11:27 -0400 |
On Mon, 09 May 2005 18:16:01 PDT, Jon Steinhart said:
> I'll take it over if that's OK with the current maintainer. I'm not a
> great expert on all of the fine points of mail delivery, but I do have
> an interest in modernizing the code base and adding new features.
Fear not - there's a goodly number of great experts lurking here, so if you're
unsure about something, asking here will get you the info you need. What's
needed is a *manager* - it's a totally different skill set. If you've got
a general vision of the direction, and can handle the details of managing
a release(*), then you're likely qualified.
(*) Vision I got. Code I got. Those who know me well know that (a) I can't
manage a release of anything myself (Hell, I have enough trouble rebooting
Morning 1.0 correctly ;) and (b) I work best if somebody *else*
is telling me "we need debugged versions of those 3 patches before the feature
freeze next Tuesday".
pgpRavARktDMk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/12
- [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Neil W Rickert, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jerry Peek, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jon Steinhart, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development,
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
[Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Bill Wohler, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Dan Harkless, 2005/05/16