[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2005 14:24:21 -0400 |
> > though. I'll even stop whining about putting autoconf-generated in CVS
> > (I'll still think that it's a huge mistake, I just won't say anything
> > about it :-) ).
>
>do you think it's a mistake even if they're commited under
>non-standard names? i agree that they probably shouldn't be
>committed under their real names, because that does cause
>confusion, and can lead to inadvertent commits.
I'm sort of on the fence on that one; I can see their purpose, but I'm
not a fan of them. I prefer that there be more frequent releases so
non-developers can just download the releases, but since in nmh's case
that's MY fault, I can't exactly say much about that, can I? :-)
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jerry Peek, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jon Steinhart, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
[Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Bill Wohler, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Dan Harkless, 2005/05/16