[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2005 11:27:50 -0400 |
> though. I'll even stop whining about putting autoconf-generated in CVS
> (I'll still think that it's a huge mistake, I just won't say anything
> about it :-) ).
do you think it's a mistake even if they're commited under
non-standard names? i agree that they probably shouldn't be
committed under their real names, because that does cause
confusion, and can lead to inadvertent commits.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 55.0 degrees)
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jerry Peek, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jon Steinhart, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
[Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Bill Wohler, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Dan Harkless, 2005/05/16