[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches
From: |
Tet |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches |
Date: |
Sun, 22 May 2005 22:18:52 +0100 |
Harald Geyer writes:
>Unfortunately I have too little experience on non-linux systems to
>know if a general change from vfork to fork is reasonable.
These days, yes it is. The number of systems actually running nmh without
COW is probably pretty negligible by now. Even for those where vfork()
is actually faster (like NetBSD, for example), there's no real advantage
to using vfork() unless you're forking an awful lot of processes, and
we're not.
Tet
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches,
Tet <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Mike O'Dell, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, mlh, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/26