[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches
From: |
mlh |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches |
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2005 00:30:29 +1000 |
On Wed, 25 May 2005 12:52:44 +0700
Robert Elz <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't know linux at all, but from what I have seen about the problem
> here, it looks as if linux doesn't really have vfork() at all, but
> some abomination that they happen to call vfork() (of course, for linux,
> that sounds pretty typical).
Oh puhlease
- [Nmh-workers] Going forward and all that, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Tet, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Mike O'Dell, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches,
mlh <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/27