[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches |
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2005 10:31:57 -0400 |
On Thu, 26 May 2005 15:44:29 +0200, Harald Geyer said:
> Hm, ok then this probably isn't that much of an issue as I thought before.
> Is fprintf(stderr, "...") ok? After all it should be unbuffered?
Don't count on unbuffered semantics, unless you can find a reference that
states that stderr is unbuggered. I can remember having issues with doing
an fprintf(stderr,.. trying to track down a SEGV in a program, and having to
specifically do a setbuf() on stderr to make it cough up the fprintf before it
hit the SEGV a few lines later... So at least on some (admittedly decade-ago)
systems, it was *not* unbuffered.
pgp9fcLpmTHNO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Tet, 2005/05/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Mike O'Dell, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, mlh, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches,
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Robert Elz, 2005/05/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] outstanding patches, Harald Geyer, 2005/05/27