[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term
From: |
Paul Vixie |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:23:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
On 12/9/2011 11:13 PM, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> Jon Fairbairn wrote:
>> Long ago, before mh I used an email system that stored email in
>> files with unique ids, which suggests a way to do this. Switch
>> to storing messages in (say) date-named accession order folders
>> with unique filenames (derived from the message-id, or simply
>> accession numbers) while the mh folders would contain symlinks
>> to these with numeric names as now. So (to continue the example)
>> sortm would not rename any message files, but just rearrange the
>> symlinks.
> If you're going to do that, you might aswell name the files using an
> SHA hash. It's not like mail files change often. The idea makes me
> wonder if git could be used as a mailstore. With a blob for each message
> and tag-blobs for classifying messages. Could be nice if you can push
> and pull mail between machines.
i actually like the idea of putting useful information into the
filename, like the file size with and without CRLF translation, since it
lets us learn things from readdir() without having to call fstat(). not
that we couldn't add a hash of some kind if we need it for uniqueness,
but i don't think we will.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jon Fairbairn, 2011/12/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Oliver Kiddle, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term,
Paul Vixie <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Mike O'Dell, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Yoshi Rokuko, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10