[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term
From: |
Earl Hood |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:58:28 -0600 |
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jeffrey Honig <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have my fetchmail scripts ignore messages with a duplicate messageid
> (using a history of messageids I've received during the last 30 days or so)
> to avoid duplicate mail.
Depends on what you mean by "duplicate". From a mail archiving perspective,
you can have multiple messages with same message ID, but can be considered
different messages, even if the "content" is the same.
Example: Mail that is sent to individuals and mailing list(s). Mailing
lists typically add additional headers (e.g. List-*) and custom footers,
so the message that is received by list subscribers is not identical
to versions received directly from the original sender.
> It is probably too much to assume that everyone would not have duplicate
> copies of a message with the same messageid. Some people may have valid
> reasons for this.
Archiving messages to mailing lists is a valid reason.
> And there may be messages w/o a message-id.
This is the case for draft messages in nmh.
--ewh
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jon Fairbairn, 2011/12/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Oliver Kiddle, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term,
Earl Hood <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Mike O'Dell, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Yoshi Rokuko, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Yoshi Rokuko, 2011/12/11
- [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/11