[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:43:29 +0000 |
Hi,
Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> If you're going to do that, you might aswell name the files using an
> SHA hash.
Thoughts I've had over the years... MH was handy because it integrated
with the Unix command line and filesystem; I still awk, etc.,
~/mail/inbox/* on occasion when nmh's commands don't suffice. That's
good; I don't think nmh should grow every bell and whistle.
MIME breaks this. If all textual parts were stored in UTF-8 on disk
things would improve once again. Perhaps even a mail/inbox/42 for a
UTF-8 summary of the email, headers and the body laid out as text where
possible, and a mail/inbox/42/... with the headers and each part as a
separate file, including sub-directories where needed, e.g.
~/mail/inbox/42/foo.png exists. Plan 9 had something along these lines.
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/4/upasfs
The other thing would be a single name for the email with links
implementing folders/tags. That backups think a lot has changed when a
folder is packed is a flaw. Possibly in the backup software, I'll
admit.
I don't see these fitting easily into nmh but thought I'd throw them out
there whilst there's list activity. :-)
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jon Fairbairn, 2011/12/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Oliver Kiddle, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Mike O'Dell, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Yoshi Rokuko, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Yoshi Rokuko, 2011/12/11
- [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/11