[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use? |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:13:16 -0500 |
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:41:11 EST, David Levine said:
> What if the user doesn't want to/can't use fcntl, and that's what
> /bin/mail uses, and the user removes it in favor of something else?
If /bin/mail uses fcnt, but the user *can't* use fcntl, both the user or
the system should be taken out back and shot. A system where the
system-provided mail facility uses a locking scheme not available to the
user is just too broken to live.
And the user who chose such a broken system is just too stupid to live.
(Sorry, am in a cranky mood today, I've spent far too much of my $DAYJOB
lately fighting with too-broken-to-live software packages...)
pgpD5ZCn11o6i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05