[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use? |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:41:09 -0500 |
Valdis wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:41:11 EST, David Levine said:
>
> > What if the user doesn't want to/can't use fcntl, and that's what
> > /bin/mail uses, and the user removes it in favor of something else?
>
> If /bin/mail uses fcnt, but the user *can't* use fcntl, both the user or
> the system should be taken out back and shot. A system where the
> system-provided mail facility uses a locking scheme not available to the
> user is just too broken to live.
I agree. I never said that any of the locking schemes isn't
available to the user. To try to save you a response (and I
should know better by now): "can't use fcntl" could be for
other reasons than "not available".
I'm all for choosing more sensible defaults.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05