[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...
From: |
Valdis Klētnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question... |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jun 2019 21:26:46 -0400 |
On Sat, 08 Jun 2019 17:17:40 -0700, Bakul Shah said:
>
> So pick runs -search on header lines as well as the body a header specific
> option is only run against headers.
In a world of Microsoft Office attachments, is having -search go through the
body by default as well still a good idea? Maybe having a separate -searchbody
would be better?
(Due to events not under my control, I'm currently stuck on a laptop with a
Celeron CPU, and disk I/O is painful (it's managing only 3-5Mbytes/sec even
with an SSD in it... Ouch)
pgp5kz8C9L0oq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/06/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Andy Bradford, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08