[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...
From: |
Andy Bradford |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question... |
Date: |
12 Jun 2019 08:46:43 -0600 |
Thus said "Valdis Kl?tnieks" on Sat, 08 Jun 2019 21:26:46 -0400:
> In a world of Microsoft Office attachments, is having -search go
> through the body by default as well still a good idea? Maybe having a
> separate -searchbody would be better?
Hard to say what it *should* be. In my environment, the majority of
messages that I use -search with do have searchable content in the body
of the message, so I've never really been concerned about it.
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 400000005d011078
- [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/06/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...,
Andy Bradford <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08