[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question... |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Jun 2019 09:49:28 +0100 |
Hi Bakul,
> So pick runs -search on header lines as well as the body a header
> specific option is only run against headers.
pick(1):
This means that the pattern specified for a -search will be found
everywhere in the message, including the header and the body, while the
other pattern matching requests are limited to the single specified
component.
> And pick matches header line *after* line folding, as tested with
> Received:
Pattern matching is performed on a per-line basis. Within the header
of the message, each component is treated as one long line, but in the
body, each line is separate.
> Conclusion: the man page is not quite accurate! But that is probably
> ok.
Based on the above extracts, it doesn't seem too bad.
Is there something in particular you think's missing?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., (continued)
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/06/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Andy Bradford, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08