[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores mo
From: |
Nicholas Jankowski |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:57:26 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #47627 (project octave):
just checked Matlab 2015b. errors on all three:
>> datenum('2015-03-31 0:00','YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM')
Error using datenum (line 178)
DATENUM failed.
Caused by:
Error using matlab.internal.datetime.cnv2icudf (line 132)
Unrecognized minute format. Format string: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM.
>> datenum('2015-04-01 0:00','YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM')
Error using datenum (line 178)
DATENUM failed.
Caused by:
Error using matlab.internal.datetime.cnv2icudf (line 132)
Unrecognized minute format. Format string: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM.
>> datenum('2015-05-01 0:00','YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM')
Error using datenum (line 178)
DATENUM failed.
Caused by:
Error using matlab.internal.datetime.cnv2icudf (line 132)
Unrecognized minute format. Format string: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47627>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month, anonymous, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month, Rik, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month,
Nicholas Jankowski <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Carnë Draug, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Mike Miller, 2016/04/29