[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be str
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:43:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0 |
Update of bug #47627 (project octave):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor
Priority: 5 - Normal => 3 - Low
Item Group: Incorrect Result => Incorrect Documentation
Status: Confirmed => Patch Submitted
Release: 4.0.1 => dev
Operating System: Microsoft Windows => Any
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #11:
The attached patch checks whether "MM" appears more than once in the format
string. I don't know enough to know whether this is the only change needed or
if there are other similar cases that should be checked for. What about more
than one occurrence of "HH"?
The patch contains some style problems, please make sure to use proper
indentation, whitespace, and commenting style.
Also please provide a correct commit message, see for examples
https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v4.0.1/General-Guidelines.html
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47627>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month, (continued)
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum gives wrong result, ignores month, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2016/04/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Carnë Draug, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2016/04/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter,
Mike Miller <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Aditya Manglik, 2016/04/30