[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails f
From: |
Arun Giridhar |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails for Rosenbrock example |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2022 08:22:54 -0400 (EDT) |
Update of bug #63286 (project octave):
Status: Need Info => Confirmed
Release: 7.1.0 => dev
Operating System: Microsoft Windows => Any
Summary: [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous
function => [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails for Rosenbrock example
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #8:
I am getting completely bizarre results for the Rosenbrock function, so I'm
marking this as Confirmed. Also retitling it since it is unrelated to
anonymous functions. (I got the same results when I created a standalone fun.m
with the same expression as the anonymous function.)
This is all with Octave 8 (hg id ee03da4812fd), optim 1.6.2, statistics 1.5.0,
and struct 1.0.18.
Test:
clear all
fun = @(x) 100*(x(2) - x(1)^2) + (1 - x(1))^2;
A = [1 2];
b = 1;
x0 = [1 0]';
x = fmincon (fun, x0, A, b)
This gives the result:
x =
1.457337448511223e+17
-7.286687242556115e+16
Changing x0 to [-1 0]' changes the output to:
x =
-3.19965837099897e+152
-2.654287402237436e+151
Changing x0 to the example's value of [-1 2]' gives the error as described by
the OP:
error: Initial parameters violate constraints.
error: called from
__lm_feasible__ at line 92 column 5
fmincon at line 456 column 24
Regarding the output causing an error for the OP, that only causes a problem
for me if x0, LB and UB are row vectors, but if they are passed as column
vectors then it works properly, so that does not look like a bug:
>> clear all; fun = @(x) 100*(x(2) - x(1)^2) + (1 - x(1))^2; [x,fval,cvg,outp]
= fmincon (fun, [0 0]', [],[], [],[], [0 0]', [1 1]')
x =
1
0
fval = -100
cvg = 2
outp =
scalar structure containing the fields:
user_interaction =
scalar structure containing the fields:
stop = [](0x1)
info = {}(0x1)
niter = 2
nobjf = 2
constrviolation = 0
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63286>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] fmincon error with anonymous function, Liang Tang, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] fmincon error with anonymous function, Liang Tang, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] fmincon error with anonymous function, Arun Giridhar, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous function, Arun Giridhar, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous function, Liang Tang, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous function, Liang Tang, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous function, Liang Tang, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous function, Arun Giridhar, 2022/10/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon error with anonymous function, Liang Tang, 2022/10/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails for Rosenbrock example,
Arun Giridhar <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails for Rosenbrock example, Liang Tang, 2022/10/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails for Rosenbrock example, Arun Giridhar, 2022/10/29