qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] tcg/s390x: Remove TCG_REG_TB


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] tcg/s390x: Remove TCG_REG_TB
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 08:45:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0

On 06/12/2022 23.22, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 12/6/22 13:29, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:51:49PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
This reverts 829e1376d940 ("tcg/s390: Introduce TCG_REG_TB"), and
several follow-up patches.  The primary motivation is to reduce the
less-tested code paths, pre-z10.  Secondarily, this allows the
unconditional use of TCG_TARGET_HAS_direct_jump, which might be more
important for performance than any slight increase in code size.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
  tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h     |   2 +-
  tcg/s390x/tcg-target.c.inc | 176 +++++--------------------------------
  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

I have a few questions/ideas for the future below.
diff --git a/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h b/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h
index 22d70d431b..645f522058 100644
--- a/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h
+++ b/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ extern uint64_t s390_facilities[3];
  #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_mulsh_i32      0
  #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_extrl_i64_i32  0
  #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_extrh_i64_i32  0
-#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_direct_jump    HAVE_FACILITY(GEN_INST_EXT)
+#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_direct_jump    1

This change doesn't seem to affect that, but what is the minimum
supported s390x qemu host? z900?

Possibly z990, if I'm reading the gcc processor_flags_table[] correctly; long-displacement-facility is definitely a minimum.

We probably should revisit what the minimum for TCG should be, assert those features at startup, and drop the corresponding runtime tests.

If we consider the official IBM support statement:

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM%20Mainframe%20Life%20Cycle%20History%20V2.10%20-%20Sept%2013%202022_1.pdf

... that would mean that the z10 and all older machines are not supported anymore.

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]