[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] target/ppc: optimize hreg_compute_pmu_hflags_value
From: |
Nicholas Piggin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] target/ppc: optimize hreg_compute_pmu_hflags_value |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:38:21 +1000 |
On Thu May 23, 2024 at 3:14 PM AEST, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> The second if-condition can be true only if the first one above is true.
> Enclose the latter into the former to avoid un-necessary check if first
> condition fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Ditto for this it's possible compiler can transform it, but I
like the code.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> target/ppc/helper_regs.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/helper_regs.c b/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
> index d09dcacd5e..261a8ba79f 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
> @@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ static uint32_t hreg_compute_pmu_hflags_value(CPUPPCState
> *env)
> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> if (env->pmc_ins_cnt) {
> hflags |= 1 << HFLAGS_INSN_CNT;
> - }
> - if (env->pmc_ins_cnt & 0x1e) {
> - hflags |= 1 << HFLAGS_PMC_OTHER;
> + if (env->pmc_ins_cnt & 0x1e) {
> + hflags |= 1 << HFLAGS_PMC_OTHER;
> + }
> }
> #endif
> #endif
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] target/ppc: optimize hreg_compute_pmu_hflags_value,
Nicholas Piggin <=