[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] target/ppc: optimize p9 exception handling routines
From: |
Nicholas Piggin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] target/ppc: optimize p9 exception handling routines |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:40:42 +1000 |
On Thu May 23, 2024 at 3:14 PM AEST, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> Currently, p9 exception handling has multiple if-condition checks where
> it does an indirect access to pending_interrupts via env. Pass the
> value during entry to avoid multiple indirect accesses.
Does code change? I don't mind, would like all CPU funtions done
the same way if we're going to do this though.
Thanks,
Nick
>
> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c
> index 0712098cf7..704eddac63 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c
> @@ -1842,10 +1842,12 @@ static int p8_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState
> *env)
> PPC_INTERRUPT_WDT | PPC_INTERRUPT_CDOORBELL | PPC_INTERRUPT_FIT | \
> PPC_INTERRUPT_PIT | PPC_INTERRUPT_THERM)
>
> -static int p9_interrupt_powersave(CPUPPCState *env)
> +static int p9_interrupt_powersave(CPUPPCState *env,
> + uint32_t pending_interrupts)
> {
> +
> /* External Exception */
> - if ((env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_EXT) &&
> + if ((pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_EXT) &&
> (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_EEE)) {
> bool heic = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_HEIC);
> if (!heic || !FIELD_EX64_HV(env->msr) ||
> @@ -1854,48 +1856,49 @@ static int p9_interrupt_powersave(CPUPPCState *env)
> }
> }
> /* Decrementer Exception */
> - if ((env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DECR) &&
> + if ((pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DECR) &&
> (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_DEE)) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_DECR;
> }
> /* Machine Check or Hypervisor Maintenance Exception */
> if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_OEE) {
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_MCK) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_MCK) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_MCK;
> }
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HMI) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HMI) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_HMI;
> }
> }
> /* Privileged Doorbell Exception */
> - if ((env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL) &&
> + if ((pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL) &&
> (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_PDEE)) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL;
> }
> /* Hypervisor Doorbell Exception */
> - if ((env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HDOORBELL) &&
> + if ((pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HDOORBELL) &&
> (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_HDEE)) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_HDOORBELL;
> }
> /* Hypervisor virtualization exception */
> - if ((env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HVIRT) &&
> + if ((pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HVIRT) &&
> (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_HVEE)) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_HVIRT;
> }
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_RESET) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_RESET) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_RESET;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState *env)
> +static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState *env,
> + uint32_t pending_interrupts)
> {
> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
>
> /* Ignore MSR[EE] when coming out of some power management states */
> bool msr_ee = FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, EE) || env->resume_as_sreset;
>
> - assert((env->pending_interrupts & P9_UNUSED_INTERRUPTS) == 0);
> + assert((pending_interrupts & P9_UNUSED_INTERRUPTS) == 0);
>
> if (cs->halted) {
> if (env->spr[SPR_PSSCR] & PSSCR_EC) {
> @@ -1903,7 +1906,7 @@ static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState *env)
> * When PSSCR[EC] is set, LPCR[PECE] controls which interrupts
> can
> * wakeup the processor
> */
> - return p9_interrupt_powersave(env);
> + return p9_interrupt_powersave(env, pending_interrupts);
> } else {
> /*
> * When it's clear, any system-caused exception exits
> power-saving
> @@ -1914,12 +1917,12 @@ static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState
> *env)
> }
>
> /* Machine check exception */
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_MCK) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_MCK) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_MCK;
> }
>
> /* Hypervisor decrementer exception */
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HDECR) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HDECR) {
> /* LPCR will be clear when not supported so this will work */
> bool hdice = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_HDICE);
> if ((msr_ee || !FIELD_EX64_HV(env->msr)) && hdice) {
> @@ -1929,7 +1932,7 @@ static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState *env)
> }
>
> /* Hypervisor virtualization interrupt */
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HVIRT) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HVIRT) {
> /* LPCR will be clear when not supported so this will work */
> bool hvice = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_HVICE);
> if ((msr_ee || !FIELD_EX64_HV(env->msr)) && hvice) {
> @@ -1938,7 +1941,7 @@ static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState *env)
> }
>
> /* External interrupt can ignore MSR:EE under some circumstances */
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_EXT) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_EXT) {
> bool lpes0 = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_LPES0);
> bool heic = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_HEIC);
> /* HEIC blocks delivery to the hypervisor */
> @@ -1950,20 +1953,20 @@ static int p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState
> *env)
> }
> if (msr_ee != 0) {
> /* Decrementer exception */
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DECR) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DECR) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_DECR;
> }
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL;
> }
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HDOORBELL) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_HDOORBELL) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_HDOORBELL;
> }
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_PERFM) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_PERFM) {
> return PPC_INTERRUPT_PERFM;
> }
> /* EBB exception */
> - if (env->pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB) {
> + if (pending_interrupts & PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB) {
> /*
> * EBB exception must be taken in problem state and
> * with BESCR_GE set.
> @@ -1989,7 +1992,7 @@ static int ppc_next_unmasked_interrupt(CPUPPCState *env)
> return p8_next_unmasked_interrupt(env);
> case POWERPC_EXCP_POWER9:
> case POWERPC_EXCP_POWER10:
> - return p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(env);
> + return p9_next_unmasked_interrupt(env, env->pending_interrupts);
> default:
> break;
> }
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] target/ppc: optimize p9 exception handling routines,
Nicholas Piggin <=