[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] intel_iommu: fix FRCD construction macro
From: |
Jason Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] intel_iommu: fix FRCD construction macro |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:51:24 +0800 |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:04 PM Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2024/7/5 19:01, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote:
> > From: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com>
> >
> > The constant must be unsigned, otherwise the two's complement
> > overrides the other fields when a PASID is present.
> >
> > Fixes: 1b2b12376c8a ("intel-iommu: PASID support")
> >
>
> The extra line behind the "Fixes tag" is not needed.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> > ---
> > hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> > index f8cf99bddf..cbc4030031 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> > @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
> > /* For the low 64-bit of 128-bit */
> > #define VTD_FRCD_FI(val) ((val) & ~0xfffULL)
> > #define VTD_FRCD_PV(val) (((val) & 0xffffULL) << 40)
> > -#define VTD_FRCD_PP(val) (((val) & 0x1) << 31)
> > +#define VTD_FRCD_PP(val) (((val) & 0x1ULL) << 31)
> > #define VTD_FRCD_IR_IDX(val) (((val) & 0xffffULL) << 48)
> >
> > /* DMA Remapping Fault Conditions */
>
> It might be fine to squash patch 02 of this series into this one. @Jason?
Not sure, we may need this for -stable. So having a standalone patch
doesn't hurt.
Thanks
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yi Liu
>
[PATCH v4 2/4] intel_iommu: move VTD_FRCD_PV and VTD_FRCD_PP declarations, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF, 2024/07/05
[PATCH v4 4/4] intel_iommu: make types match, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF, 2024/07/05
Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] VT-d minor fixes, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/07/20