qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: fix Read DMAR IQA REG DW


From: Yi Liu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: fix Read DMAR IQA REG DW
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:05:08 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 2024/7/23 10:40, Yee Li wrote:
When dmar_readq or devmem2 read the DW of IQA always 0UL because
"& VTD_IQA_QS". So, try to fix it.

case:
after vtd_mem_write
IQA val: 0x100206801

after vtd_mem_read
IQA val: 0x100206001

Signed-off-by: yeeli <seven.yi.lee@gmail.com>

I think you may need to capitalize the first character of your first and
last name.


how was this tested?

If VT-D hardware supports scalable mode, Linux will set the IQA DW (bit 11).
In qemu, the vtd_mem_write and vtd_update_iq_dw set DW well, however,
vtd_mem_read the DW wrong because "& VTD_IQA_QS" dropped the value
of DW (bit 11).

So testing the patch is easy,

config the "x-scalable-mode" option as below:

"-device intel-iommu,caching-mode=on,x-scalable-mode=on,aw-bits=48"

after Linux OS boot, check the IQA_REG DW (bit 11) as below:

IOMMU_DEBUGFS:

"cat /sys/kernel/debug/iommu/intel |grep IQA"
"IQA        0x90        0x00000001001da801"

or devmem2 read the reg:

"devmem2 0xfed90090"
"/dev/mem opened."
"Memory mapped at address 0x7f983014f000."
"Value at address 0xFED90090 (0x7f983014f000): 0x0"


So you found it by checking the debugfs output, and it looks to miss
the DW bit. is it? Put a clearer commit message would be helpful.

Please address Michael's comment, add a "Fixes: xxx" tag and resend.

--
Regards,
Yi Liu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]