qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 09/13] target/i386: do not use gen_op_jz_ecx for repeated string


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [PATCH 09/13] target/i386: do not use gen_op_jz_ecx for repeated string operations
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:06:08 +0100

Explicitly generate a TSTEQ branch (which is optimized to NE x,0 if possible).
This does not make much sense yet, but later we will add more checks and some
will use a temporary to check on the decremented value of CX/ECX/RCX; it will
be clearer for all checks to share the same logic using TSTEQ(reg, cx_mask).

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 target/i386/tcg/translate.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
index 4b53a47000e..8ef938372d5 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,7 @@ static void do_gen_rep(DisasContext *s, MemOp ot,
                        bool is_repz_nz)
 {
     TCGLabel *done = gen_new_label();
+    target_ulong cx_mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, 8 << s->aflag);
     bool had_rf = s->flags & HF_RF_MASK;
 
     /*
@@ -1358,7 +1359,7 @@ static void do_gen_rep(DisasContext *s, MemOp ot,
     tcg_set_insn_start_param(s->base.insn_start, 1, CC_OP_DYNAMIC);
 
     /* Any iteration at all?  */
-    gen_op_jz_ecx(s, done);
+    tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_TSTEQ, cpu_regs[R_ECX], cx_mask, done);
 
     fn(s, ot);
     gen_op_add_reg_im(s, s->aflag, R_ECX, -1);
-- 
2.47.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]