On 14/11/24 04:10, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 11/13/24 17:12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
'vaddr' is declared in "exec/vaddr.h".
Include it in order to avoid when refactoring:
include/exec/translation-block.h:56:5: error: unknown type name
'vaddr'
56 | vaddr pc;
| ^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
include/exec/translation-block.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/exec/translation-block.h
b/include/exec/translation-block.h
index a6d1af6e9b..b99afb0077 100644
--- a/include/exec/translation-block.h
+++ b/include/exec/translation-block.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include "qemu/thread.h"
#include "exec/cpu-common.h"
+#include "exec/vaddr.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
#include "qemu/interval-tree.h"
#endif
I'm a bit confused by commit message, but it seems that this series has
some commits that will not compile. Is that something acceptable?
Because commits must be bisect-able, that is not acceptable.
I took a lot of care to make this series builable on each step,
but might have missed something. Can you point me at the
configuration used and broken patch?
I'll reword the commit description as:
---
'vaddr' type is declared in "exec/vaddr.h".
"exec/translation-block.h" uses this type without including
the corresponding header. It works because this header is
indirectly included, but won't work when the other headers
are refactored:
[error]
Explitly include "exec/vaddr.h" to avoid such problem in a
few commits.
---
Does it clarify?