[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 12/19] target/riscv: add KVM specific MISA properties
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 12/19] target/riscv: add KVM specific MISA properties |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:32:47 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 11:14:45AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 6/23/23 06:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:56:53AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > ...
> > > +#define KVM_MISA_CFG(_bit, _reg_id) \
> > > + {.offset = _bit, .kvm_reg_id = _reg_id}
> > > +
> > > +/* KVM ISA extensions */
> > > +static KVMCPUConfig kvm_misa_ext_cfgs[] = {
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVA, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_A),
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVC, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_C),
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVD, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_D),
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVF, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_F),
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVH, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_H),
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVI, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_I),
> > > + KVM_MISA_CFG(RVM, KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_M),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > ...
> > > +static void kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_misa_ext_cfgs); i++) {
> > > + KVMCPUConfig *misa_cfg = &kvm_misa_ext_cfgs[i];
> > > + int bit = misa_cfg->offset;
> > > +
> > > + misa_cfg->name = misa_ext_info_arr[bit].name;
> > > + misa_cfg->description = misa_ext_info_arr[bit].description;
> >
> > I'd prefer these be set by KVM_MISA_CFG(), since we can. No need to wait
> > until runtime if we can do it at compile-time.
>
> The compiler will complain about "error: initializer element is not constant"
> and
> the build will fail. This happens because, apparently, the compiler doesn't
> see the
> imported array as a constant, regardless of the 'const' type.
>
You're right. Initialization the way I suggested only works when
everything is in the same source file. That's a pity. So we can
either manage it they way you've done here or the way you did
in a previous patch, which was to include the info array in each
source file by putting it in the header. I think I prefer the
approach you used in this version more though.
Thanks,
drew
- [PATCH v3 03/19] target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'mvendorid' value, (continued)
- [PATCH v3 03/19] target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'mvendorid' value, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 04/19] target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'mimpid' value, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 08/19] target/riscv: handle mvendorid/marchid/mimpid for KVM CPUs, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 05/19] target/riscv/cpu.c: restrict 'marchid' value, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 10/19] target/riscv/kvm.c: init 'misa_ext_mask' with scratch CPU, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 07/19] target/riscv: read marchid/mimpid in kvm_riscv_init_machine_ids(), Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 13/19] target/riscv/kvm.c: update KVM MISA bits, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- [PATCH v3 12/19] target/riscv: add KVM specific MISA properties, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
- Re: [PATCH v3 12/19] target/riscv: add KVM specific MISA properties, Andrew Jones, 2023/06/26
[PATCH v3 11/19] target/riscv/cpu: add misa_ext_info_arr[], Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
[PATCH v3 09/19] linux-headers: Update to v6.4-rc1, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
[PATCH v3 14/19] target/riscv/kvm.c: add multi-letter extension KVM properties, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
[PATCH v3 06/19] target/riscv: use KVM scratch CPUs to init KVM properties, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
[PATCH v3 15/19] target/riscv/cpu.c: remove priv_ver check from riscv_isa_string_ext(), Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22
[PATCH v3 16/19] target/riscv/cpu.c: create KVM mock properties, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/06/22