qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 14/48] include/hw/s390x: replace assert(false) with g_asse


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/48] include/hw/s390x: replace assert(false) with g_assert_not_reached()
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:12:16 +0100

On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 12:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/9/24 09:38, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> > This patch is part of a series that moves towards a consistent use of
> > g_assert_not_reached() rather than an ad hoc mix of different
> > assertion mechanisms.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >   include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> We usually don't precise "include/" in patch subject:
> we treat include/FOO as part of FOO area.

I would say either is OK -- if you do
git log --oneline | grep ' include' |less

you can see plenty of examples where 'include' was used in
the subject-area prefix, especially if, as here, we're changing
just one file.

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]