[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix |
Date: |
20 Mar 2001 17:03:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <address@hidden> writes:
Peter> Alexandre Oliva writes:
>> Anyway, automake uses `echo timestamp > file', instead of touch,
>> and I've always thought the reason was to avoid having an empty
>> file.
Peter> The reason (which is documented somewhere in the auto* manuals)
I don't know where.
Peter> is that on some (BSD?) systems a 'touch' of an empty file
Peter> doesn't update the time stamp. So in a way, yes, you're
Peter> avoiding empty files, but it is only necessary in 'make'
Peter> context.
If someone could specify an actual system like this, I'd be happy to
update autoconf.texi.
- RE: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, (continued)
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Eric Siegerman, 2001/03/19
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Bob Proulx, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/20
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Jim Meyering, 2001/03/20
Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix, Paul Eggert, 2001/03/19