[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:07:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:20:02PM +0000, John Poltorak wrote:
: On further investigation, it seems to be coming from here:-
:
: $(srcdir)/version.texi: stamp-vti
: @:
:
: My Make struggles to understand '@:'.
:
: What is it supposed to mean?
@ tags the make rule so that make doesn't display it before executing it,
and : is the command. It's basically a "nop" in this context. I don't
get why it's there - shouldn't be necessary from what I know about portable
makefiles.
Lars J
--
Innovation is one percent inspiration and ninetynine percent perspiration,
and in my case; twice that... -- Norville Barnes, `The Hudsucker Proxy'
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, (continued)
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Raja R Harinath, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Paul D. Smith, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, John Poltorak, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Paul D. Smith, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, John Poltorak, 2001/03/21
- RE: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Tim Van Holder, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Paul D. Smith, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, John Poltorak, 2001/03/21
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Raja R Harinath, 2001/03/21
RE: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2001/03/21